1. In a democracy, why is a universal adult franchise important?
1. In a democracy, why is a universal adult franchise important?
Explanation:
A democracy needs universal adult suffrage because it is founded on the ideal of equality. Everyone has one ballot, regardless of gender or socioeconomic position, the citizens are guaranteed. A universal adult vote is crucial in a democracy because it is founded on the ideal of equity. It declares that each mature citizen has one vote, regardless of their financial situation or the groups they are a part of. The Universal Adult Franchise is significant in a democracy for the following reasons:
Democracy is a form of administration that is run by, for, and by the people.
Every adult is eligible to vote, regardless of caste, creed, country, area, sex, wealth, or heritage. A global adult brand is what this is.
The universal adult brand is founded on the idea of equity.
All citizens have identical rights in democracies.
2.Read the box on Article 15 and state two ways in which the article addresses inequality.
Explanation:
Inequality in terms of prejudice against people based on their race, faith, caste, gender, location of origin, etc. is addressed in Article 15. It also tackles the issue of whether or not there should be prejudice based on the aforementioned factors when using public facilities like wells, reservoirs, bathing ghats, and roadways that receive complete or partial government financing.
This Article tackles disparities in access to businesses, public dining establishments, lodging facilities, and amusement venues, as well as [b] the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roadways, and public resorts that are entirely or partially funded by public resources or intended for use by the general public.
3.In what was ways Omprakash Valmiki’s experience similar to that of the Ansaris?
Explanation:
While the Ansaris experienced discrimination because of their faith, Omprakash Valmiki experienced discrimination because of his family. The fundamental connection between them is that they both experienced birth discrimination, which is against Article 15's prohibitions. Due to his Dalit origin, Omprakash Valmiki was forced to clean the school and its surroundings, which diminished his respect. He was also denied the opportunity to seat with his peers. Due to the Ansaris' different faith from the bulk of the apartment complex's residents, they were refused access to a rental apartment.
4.What do you understand by the term “all personnel are equal before the law”? Why do you think it is important in a democracy?
4.What do you understand by the term “all personnel are equal before the law”? Why do you think it is important in a democracy?
Explanation:
According to the concept of "all persons are equal before the law," all residents, regardless of their social or economic status, are required to abide by the same laws. A individual cannot be legally discriminated against because of their ethnicity, faith, caste, or gender.
The concept of equity is fundamental to democracy because it accords everyone with respect and equality. If there were no differences based on ethnicity, religion, gender, etc., it would not have arisen in the first place.
5.The Government of India passed the Disabilities Act in 1995. This law states thatpersons with disabilities have equal rights and that the government should makepossible their full participation. The government has to provide free education andintegrate children with disabilities into mainstream schools. This law also states that all public spaces, including buildings, schools etc., should be accessible andprovided with ramps
Look at the photograph and think about the boy who is being carried with the stair. Do you think that the law stated above is being implemented in this regard? What needs to be done to make the building accessible
Look at the photograph and think about the boy who is being carried with the stair. Do you think that the law stated above is being implemented in this regard? What needs to be done to make the building accessible
Explanation:
The child in the picture clearly has a disability. The structure ought to have been available to him in accordance with the Disabilities Act of 1995. But in this case, the legislation is not being followed. In reality, having the security guards carry him down can be quite hazardous. The government can address this issue by constructing ramps alongside each building's staircases. In this manner, mobility for people with physical impairments is made possible. The boy in the photograph is disabled. As per the law this building should have been accessible for him. But we see the law is not being implemented in his case. He is being carried down by security personnel through stairs. This building does not provide ramps. The boy’s dignity is overlooked here. He may morally feel inferior. The way he is carried down the stars may prove dangerous. Law should take this case to the court.
