1. What are the many ways that power is shared in contemporary democracies? Describe each of these with an example.

Explanation:

Under a horizontal power-sharing structure, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government all have equal access to authority. the Indian case

In the federal system of power-sharing, many levels of government, including the national general government and state and local governments, are allowed to share authority. the Indian case (Union Government and State Governments) Other social groupings, such as those based on language and religion, may also share influence in community administration. 

from Belgium It is ensured that there aren't just a few people in charge by sharing power among political parties, pressure groups, and movements. Progressively, power is divided among political parties that represent various ideologies and social classes.


2. Provide one prudential and one moral justification for power sharing along with a scenario from India as an example.

Explanation:

However prudential factors underline that power-sharing will result in better outcomes. The many governmental organisations in India horizontally share power. The legislature, executive branch, and judicial branch are in charge of running India. In India, some industries are given advantages over others in order to avoid disagreements.

The benefit of power-sharing in its purest form is highlighted by moral concerns. In India, the state accords citizens fundamental rights and implicitly respects the guiding principles of its policies.


3. Three students came to three distinct conclusions after reading this chapter. Why do you agree with which of these? In about 50 words, explain your position. Thomman - Societies with linguistic, religious, or racial divides are the only ones where power sharing is essential. Power sharing is only appropriate for large countries with regional divides, according to Mathayi. Every community, no matter how tiny or without class differences, needs some sort of power-sharing.

Explanation:

The conclusion Ouseph came to is a good one. There should be a form of power sharing in every state. The finest possible balance between the many components of society is achieved through power sharing. Together with the possibility of injustice, conflict likelihood declines. The concept of democracy is therefore embodied in power sharing. Power sharing is also a great way to ensure the stability of the political system.


4. A restriction on French language instruction in the town's schools has been upheld by the mayor of Merchtem, a Belgian municipality close to Brussels. He said that the prohibition would facilitate the integration of all non-Dutch speakers into this Flemish community. Do you believe that this action complies with Belgium's power-sharing agreements? In around 50 words, explain your position.

Explanation:

The mayor of Merchtem is being unreasonable by prohibiting French instruction at the town's schools, which are near to Brussels. The power-sharing system in existence in Belgium is not followed. Power sharing keeps society's many features in balance. In Belgium, the Dutch and French must continue to share power in order to avert civil unrest. The probability of public unrest will rise if the French are forbidden. In order to promote harmony among the town's varied communities, the mayor should encourage a bilingual education system in the town's schools.


5. Choose one of the prudential arguments for power sharing presented in the paragraph that follows. "In order to fulfil Mahatma Gandhi's ideal and the intentions of the architects of our Constitution, we must provide the panchayats additional authority. True democracy is established via panchayati raj. That puts power back in the people's hands, which is the only place it belongs in a democracy. Another strategy to lower corruption and improve administrative effectiveness is to give Panchayats more authority. People would naturally exercise greater control over developmental schemes if they were involved in their planning and execution. The dishonest intermediaries would no longer be present. Panchayati Raj will bolster the foundations of our democracy as a result.

Explanation:

The passage's prudential justification is that "granting Panchayats power is also a strategy to minimise corruption and promote administrative efficiency."

EXPLAINATION: Prudential motives are outcome-based motivations. The effects are considered as each action is calculated. Prudential reasoning stresses the division of authority throughout society to avoid conflicts. Giving the Panchayati authority is suggested in this paragraph because it lowers the influence of corruption and power.


6. Different arguments are usually put forth in favour of and against power-sharing. Identify those which are in favour of power-sharing and select the answer using the codes given below. Power-sharing:

  1. reduces conflict among different communities

  2. decreases the possibility of arbitrariness

  3. delays the decision-making process

  4. accommodates diversities

  5. increases instability and divisiveness

  6. promotes people’s participation in government

  7. . undermines the unity of a country

(a)

A

B

D

F

(b)

A

C

E

F

(c)

A

B

D

G

(d)

B

C

D

G

Explanation:

  1. reduces conflict among different communities.

  2. decreases the possibility of arbitrariness.

            D. accommodates diversities.

F. promotes people’s participation in government.


7. Take into account the following claims on the power-sharing structures of Belgium and Sri Lanka.

A. In Belgium, the minority French-speaking community was being oppressed by the Dutch-speaking majority.

B. Government initiatives in Sri Lanka aimed to maintain the majority's domination over the Sinhala language.

C. To ensure that their culture, language, and access to equal opportunities in employment and education were protected, the Tamils of Sri Lanka demanded a federal system of power-sharing.

D. Belgium's transition from a unitary to a federal government avoided a potential language split in the nation.

Which of the statements given above is correct?

(a) A, B, C and D

(b) A, B and D

(c) C and D

(d) B, C and D

Explanation:

(d) B, C and D

B. Government initiatives in Sri Lanka aimed to maintain the majority's domination over the Sinhala language.

C. To ensure that their culture, language, and access to equal opportunities in employment and education were protected, the Tamils of Sri Lanka demanded a federal system of power-sharing.

D. Belgium's transition from a unitary to a federal government avoided a potential language split in the nation.

EXPLAINATION: There are two ways that the government can be run. One is tyranny, in which a ruler or monarch exercises excessive power. On the other hand, a democracy is a system of government. There are several tiers of authority delegation in this. You already know that, but the second option is clearly better. Then, how does power sharing operate? Can you briefly explain why power sharing is so important before moving on? Let's analyse power sharing and all of its variations. So let's find out more about power sharing.


8. Match List I (forms of power-sharing) with List II (forms of government) and select the correct answer using the codes given below in the lists.


List I


1.

Power shared among different organs of government

A. Community government

2.

Power shared among governments at different levels

B.Separation of powers

3.

Power shared by different social groups


4.

Power shared by two or more political parties

D. Federal government

Explanation:

1. Power is shared among different organs of government.

B. Separation of powers.

EXPLAINATION: In India, roles and powers are separated rather than inverted. India does not fully apply the idea of the division of powers, in contrast to the US. The court has the authority to void any unlawful legislation that the legislature authorises due to the checks and balances system that has been formed.

2. Power is shared among governments at different levels.

D. Federal government

EXPLAINATION: Federalism is a form of hierarchy in which two levels of authority have varying degrees of jurisdiction over the same territory. This combination of exclusive and shared powers is the reverse of "centralised" kinds of governments, such as those in England and France, under which the national government maintains exclusive control over all geographic areas.

3. Power shared by different social groups

A. Community Government

EXPLAINATION: Many social groupings, including linguistic and religious ones, may share power. Diverse social groups that might normally feel cut off from the government will now have a place in the administration and the government.

4. Power shared by two or more political parties.

C. Coalition government

EXPLAINATION: In modern parliaments, coalitions typically form when no one political party can win a majority of votes. When two or more parties can reach an agreement on a shared agenda without making too many significant concessions to their particular political philosophies, they can move on with forming a government.


9. Consider the following two statements on power-sharing and select the answer using the codes given below.

A). Power-sharing is good for democracy.

B). It helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.

Which of these statements are true and false?

(a) A is true, but B is false

(b) Both A and B are true

(c) Both A and B are false

(d) A is false, but B is true

Explanation:

(b) Both A and B are true


EXPLAINATION: Power sharing is a useful strategy to guarantee the stability of political order since social strife frequently results in bloodshed and political instability. Democracy's basic essence is power sharing. A democratic rule entails sharing authority with those who must bear the consequences of its application.